FSRS Desired Retention: What Should You Set It To?
If you use FSRS — in Anki or any other app — there's one setting that matters more than all the others: desired retention. It decides how often you review, how much you remember, and whether your daily queue stays sane. The default is 90%, and for most people that's the right answer. But it helps to know why, and when to move it. We ran a year-long simulation with the real FSRS-6 scheduler to put numbers on the trade-off.
What desired retention actually means
Desired retention is the probability that you'll still remember a card at the moment it comes up for review. At 90%, FSRS waits until it predicts a 90% chance of recall, then shows you the card. At 80% it waits longer — until your recall has dropped further — so you review less often and forget a little more.
Two things follow from that:
- It isn't your overall score. Between reviews your recall is higher than the target — it starts near 100% right after a review and only sinks to the target at the next one. So at 90% desired retention, the share of your deck you could recall on any given day is noticeably above 90%.
- It's a workload dial. A higher target means shorter intervals and more reviews. The relationship isn't linear: each extra point costs more than the last.
The Anki manual puts the warning plainly: above 90% the workload increases very quickly, and above 97% it can be overwhelming.
What happens at each setting: a year-long simulation
To make the trade-off concrete, we simulated a student who adds 20 new cards every day for a year — 7,300 cards — using the FSRS-6 scheduler with its default parameters. Each review succeeds with exactly the probability the model predicts, so the only thing that changes between runs is the desired retention. Results are averaged over five runs.
| Desired retention | Reviews a day by month 12 | Total reviews in the year | Cards you could recall at year end |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80% | 101 | 26,800 | 6,548 (90%) |
| 85% | 127 | 31,100 | 6,772 (93%) |
| 90% (default) | 150 | 38,100 | 6,946 (95%) |
| 95% | 204 | 55,400 | 7,119 (98%) |
| 97% | 284 | 75,100 | 7,189 (98%) |
Read it from the default outwards:
- 90% → 95% adds about a third to your daily reviews and 45% more total work, to remember about 2.5% more of your cards.
- 90% → 97% roughly doubles your total reviews for about 3.5% more cards remembered.
- 90% → 85% saves about 15% of your daily reviews and costs about 2.5% of your cards.
That's the whole argument for the default: past 90%, you pay a lot of extra review time for very little extra memory. Below it, you save time but the losses start to add up.
How we ran it: FSRS-6 via the open-source ts-fsrs library, default parameters, no interval fuzz, 20 new cards a day for 365 days, success probability equal to predicted recall, "Good" on success and "Again" on failure, same-day relearning resolved immediately. It's a model of an idealised learner — your numbers will differ — but the shape of the trade-off is what matters.
What should you set it to?
- Most people, most of the time: 90%. It's the default for good reason — the best balance of workload and memory in the table above.
- Exam in the next few weeks, material you can't afford to miss: 93–95%. Worth the extra reviews for a short, high-stakes window. Keep it to the decks that matter, not everything.
- Big backlog, busy season, or low-stakes breadth material: 80–85%. You'll forget a bit more but keep the habit alive — and a queue you actually clear beats a perfect one you abandon.
- Almost never: above 97%. The workload climbs steeply and most apps (including Anki's guidance) advise against it.
Two practical tips. Change retention per deck, not globally — your core exam subject and your casual vocabulary deck don't need the same target. And give a new setting a couple of weeks before judging it; the queue takes time to settle.
Common mistakes
- Setting 99% "to be safe". The table shows why this backfires: 97% already doubles the work of 90% for a sliver more memory, and the curve only gets steeper above it — a queue that eventually breaks your habit.
- Lowering retention to fix a backlog, then forgetting to raise it. Fine as a temporary measure; put it back once you're caught up.
- Confusing retention with your success rate on hard cards. Your "true retention" statistic will hover around the target across your whole collection; individual difficult cards will fail more often, and FSRS already accounts for that.
- Tweaking weekly. Retention is a strategy setting. Pick one, then spend your energy on reviewing.
Setting it in Anki
In Anki: open a deck's Options, enable FSRS in the FSRS section, and set Desired retention (0.90 by default). Anki also offers tools to simulate workload at different retention levels. Once you have a few hundred reviews, use Optimize to fit FSRS's parameters to your own memory — that personalises the intervals without changing your retention target. (New to FSRS? Start with FSRS vs SM-2.)
Setting it in StudyTab
StudyTab schedules with FSRS-6 and gives you four presets — Relaxed (80%), Balanced (90%), Intense (95%) and Exam Prep (97%) — or any value from 70% to 97% on the slider. Study modes set retention per deck (for example 85% for a relaxed deck and 92% for an exam deck), and the schedule calendar shows the reviews due over the next 30 days so you can see a change before it bites. (How many new cards that load supports: how many flashcards per day.)
Bottom line
Keep desired retention at 90% unless you have a specific reason not to. Nudge it up to 93–95% for a short, high-stakes run before an exam, down to 80–85% when you need to protect the habit — and treat anything above 97% as a trap. In our simulation, the jump from 90% to 97% doubled the work for 3.5% more memory.
Want the scheduling handled for you? Build a deck and let FSRS pace it.
Frequently asked questions
What is a good desired retention for FSRS?
90% — the default — for most people. In a year-long FSRS-6 simulation with 20 new cards a day, moving from 90% to 97% roughly doubled total reviews while increasing cards remembered by only about 3.5%. Raise it to 93–95% only for short, high-stakes exam runs.
Does higher desired retention mean I remember more?
Yes, but with sharply diminishing returns. Each point above 90% costs more reviews than the last; the Anki manual warns that above 90% the workload increases very quickly and above 97% it can be overwhelming.
Should I lower desired retention if I have too many reviews?
It is a reasonable short-term fix: going from 90% to 85% cut daily reviews by about 15% in our simulation, at the cost of about 2.5% of cards remembered. Also lower your daily new-card limit, and raise retention again once you have caught up.
Is desired retention the same as how much of my deck I remember?
No. It is your predicted recall at the moment a card is due. Between reviews your recall is higher, so the share of your deck you could recall on a given day is above the target — around 95% at the 90% default in our simulation.
Should desired retention be the same for every deck?
No. Set it per deck: higher for material that must be exam-ready soon, lower for broad or low-stakes material. That keeps your total workload manageable while protecting what matters most.
References
- Anki Manual — Deck options: FSRS, desired retention, optimizer and simulator.
- Open Spaced Repetition. ts-fsrs — TypeScript implementation of FSRS (used for the simulation).
- Su, J., Ye, J., Nie, L., Cao, Y., & Chen, Y. (2023). Optimizing spaced repetition schedule by capturing the dynamics of memory. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(10), 10085–10097.